miércoles, 6 de febrero de 2019

QUANTUM THEORY OF GAMES BY ANTHEUS

Own game theory with quantum mechanics, with uncertainty / indeterminacy principle of Heisemberg, with fuzzy Logic and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).

It is based on the formulation of hypotheses for the resolution of a problem ("game or system") that are refuted or affirmed, considering the "tricks" as well as the techniques of "cheating" ("decoy") of the "hunting / fishing" ",for example.

The desired solution is also given, which is the one that most adjusts to reality in order to solve the hypothesis and mount the reduction to absurdity or induction, for example. The tools are used to demonstrate a hypothesis with the proviso that it can be false or true (Heisemberg uncertainty / indeterminacy principle) and a logic is applied that for example in a triple like duck, fish, hammer tells you that hammer is the element discordant because it is not an animal ("game" for gifted children).

My Games theory solves "MILITARY CHESS" (3rd WORLD WAR / DEEP BLUE does it with modern "MILITARY CHESS" & that is the mistake) with PEACE solves the economic cycles of a Gaussian bell or Gaussian function like fashion or stock markets, for example, that they are the economic cycles that cause the world wars (economic by a systematic error of the international market of central bank without pattern).

The system / "game" is placed in a moment of "absolute error" or "systemic error", at that moment they are in the "Nash equilibrium", the scenario that is expressed in the formulation of hypothesis and a solution, the hypotheses refute or affirm with the appropriate mathematical instruments (reduction to absurdity, induction, etc.) the problem is to know when the "systemic error" occurs since there are no "tools" to detect it and only patients with bipolar disorder have that intuition as John Forbes Nash and me,for example.To determine when the "absolute or systemic error" occurs, the uncertainty / indeterminacy principle of Heisemberg is used with fuzzy logic applied. It asks: When the "Nash equilibrium" will not be fulfilled and under what "premises" (hypothesis a to formulate later)? The system is audited in search of "systemic error" .To explain it let's take an example: the game of "military chess" of DEEP BLUE in Fort Meade, is part of the solution ("TABLES", like the " 3 in line "/ PEACE) and the scenario is posed (work hypothesis / scenario / positions of the pieces of the board according to our military resources and those of our allies and the enemy potential, from there a rebuttal is proposed or affirm the information obtained from the "battlefield" by the intelligence services of the DIA (Defense Intelligence of Army) and with them the positions of the board are corrected, but it is not played in a single scenario or board is played in n infinite scenarios or boards with the same solution and the information is used to act with geopolitics in the politicians and geostrategy in the DIA and this is the solution of "military chess" ("TABLES" with the minimum loss of own pieces). predict the behavior of the adversary based on the TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) and its past movements.