QUANTUM THEORY OF GAMES by Antheus
Own theory of quantum mechanics games with
the principle of uncertainty / indeterminacy of Heisenberg, with fuzzy logic
and theory of planned behavior (TPB).
It is based on the formulation of hypotheses for solving a problem ( "game or system") that "refutes or says , " considering the "tricks" and techniques of "cheating" ( "bait") and techniques of "hunting / fishing" (techniques to 'link' chicks ).
The desired solution is also given, which is the most suited to reality to solve the hypothesis and mount reduction to the absurd or induction, for example. The tools are used to demonstrate a hypothesis with the condition that may be false or true (principle of uncertainty / indeterminacy of Heisenberg) and a logic applies, for example, in a 'short list': duck, fish, hammer, you say that the hammer is the jarring element because it is not an animal (It is a "play" for gifted children when they have a few years).
My theory solves the quantum games as "MILITARY CHESS" (3rd. WORLD WAR is a 'game' / DEEP BLUE, the 'IBM supercomputer’ to play chess, it does with the modern "MILITARY CHESS" and that is the' error') with 'World Peace` and 'TABLES with fewer parts LOST' is the solution.Also my theory solves the economic cycles of a ‘Gaussian bell’ or ‘Gaussian functions’ as 'fashion' or stock markets, by example. , Which are economic cycles that cause world wars (‘systemic mistake of the international market for the central bank without pattern’). (http://matrixattac.blogspot.com/2018/06/titulo-errorsistemico-del-sistema.html)
The system / "game" is placed at a time of "absolute error" or "systemic error" at that time is in the "Nash equilibrium", the scenario that is expressed in the formulation of hypotheses and a solution, the hypothesis is refuted or claim with the appropriate mathematical tools (reduction to the absurd, induction, etc.) the problem is knowing when the "systemic error" occurs because there is no "tools" to detect and only 'patients with bipolar disorder' they have that intuition as John Forbes Nash and me, for example. To determine when the "absolute or systemic error", the principle of uncertainty / indeterminacy occurs Heisemberg used with fuzzy logic applied. Question: When does the "Nash equilibrium" will be fulfilled
The system is audited in search of "systemic error". To explain it, we take an example: the game of "military chess" Deep Blue Fort Meade, is part of the solution ( "TABLES", as solving the "3 online" / in'world peace’) and arises the 'scenario' ('hipótesis of work' /'scenario’ / positions of the pieces of the table' according to our military resources and those of our allies and / the potential / is 'enemy’ / s', from there it proposes a 'refutatión' or information obtained from the "battlefield" is 'afirmative' by the intelligence services of the DIA (Defense Intelligence of Army of the USA, eg.) and with them the 'positions are corrected in the table'.
Predicting the behavior of the adversary based on the TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) and past movements.
Application to the economy.
It is acting in the 'peaks' highs and lows of the 'bell curve' of the role of financial markets.But yet, the ‘HOWTO’ is not explained.
It is based on the formulation of hypotheses for solving a problem ( "game or system") that "refutes or says , " considering the "tricks" and techniques of "cheating" ( "bait") and techniques of "hunting / fishing" (techniques to 'link' chicks ).
The desired solution is also given, which is the most suited to reality to solve the hypothesis and mount reduction to the absurd or induction, for example. The tools are used to demonstrate a hypothesis with the condition that may be false or true (principle of uncertainty / indeterminacy of Heisenberg) and a logic applies, for example, in a 'short list': duck, fish, hammer, you say that the hammer is the jarring element because it is not an animal (It is a "play" for gifted children when they have a few years).
My theory solves the quantum games as "MILITARY CHESS" (3rd. WORLD WAR is a 'game' / DEEP BLUE, the 'IBM supercomputer’ to play chess, it does with the modern "MILITARY CHESS" and that is the' error') with 'World Peace` and 'TABLES with fewer parts LOST' is the solution.Also my theory solves the economic cycles of a ‘Gaussian bell’ or ‘Gaussian functions’ as 'fashion' or stock markets, by example. , Which are economic cycles that cause world wars (‘systemic mistake of the international market for the central bank without pattern’). (http://matrixattac.blogspot.com/2018/06/titulo-errorsistemico-del-sistema.html)
The system / "game" is placed at a time of "absolute error" or "systemic error" at that time is in the "Nash equilibrium", the scenario that is expressed in the formulation of hypotheses and a solution, the hypothesis is refuted or claim with the appropriate mathematical tools (reduction to the absurd, induction, etc.) the problem is knowing when the "systemic error" occurs because there is no "tools" to detect and only 'patients with bipolar disorder' they have that intuition as John Forbes Nash and me, for example. To determine when the "absolute or systemic error", the principle of uncertainty / indeterminacy occurs Heisemberg used with fuzzy logic applied. Question: When does the "Nash equilibrium" will be fulfilled
The system is audited in search of "systemic error". To explain it, we take an example: the game of "military chess" Deep Blue Fort Meade, is part of the solution ( "TABLES", as solving the "3 online" / in'world peace’) and arises the 'scenario' ('hipótesis of work' /'scenario’ / positions of the pieces of the table' according to our military resources and those of our allies and / the potential / is 'enemy’ / s', from there it proposes a 'refutatión' or information obtained from the "battlefield" is 'afirmative' by the intelligence services of the DIA (Defense Intelligence of Army of the USA, eg.) and with them the 'positions are corrected in the table'.
Predicting the behavior of the adversary based on the TPB (Theory of Planned Behavior) and past movements.
Application to the economy.
It is acting in the 'peaks' highs and lows of the 'bell curve' of the role of financial markets.But yet, the ‘HOWTO’ is not explained.
